"Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat these mistakes again and again
Some of the problems I have noticed across all EPC companies are which if resolved
will help in Rapid execution+ Absolute work completed + Class Quality and
within cost.
"Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat
these mistakes again and again
¡
We are never clear
on BC /SOW and hence do not plan accordingly
¡
Our Vision Mission
and Strategic plans are not matching with each other and also with BC and
SOW.
- We
don’t identify who are our stake holders or understand how they can help
us or we can help them
- We
don’t take them seriously or identify our allies/ or who will need
special follow up.
- We
don’t ask for a plan from stake holders that will include
Initiate + plan+ execute+ M&C and closing of their individual plan
- We
don’t have a stake holder register, don’t make one only
- We
don’t know how and when to interact and make them Mutually accountable
with us
- Their
individual plan is a must for their buy in agreed mutually
- Stake
Holder don’t take us seriously after any meeting. MOM are not followed
up/ no feedback and if asked…they will give any number of excuses /
reasons/ obstacles processes that need to be cleared .
- We
are merely talking a but but Ignoring the impact of real risk
threats and opportunities in beginning and not catering for resources to
negate that
- While making the strategic plan we ignore old lesson learned of similar projects .
- Project requirements start with what the user really needs (not what the provider perceives that the user needs) and end when those needs are satisfied as evidenced by successful user validation. However, many projects start with ill-defined user and customer requirements, leading to their discovery by the development process itself and we keep changing designs / proposals with new needs.
DEVELOPING THE
PROJECT NETWORK AND SCHEDULE is only Soft ware centric, we
refuse to apply ourselves as a result we will feed a data to impress everybody
resulting in gaps between reality and soft ware plan
- Most
project run late
- Knowledge
workers cannot be effectively managed using command and control paradigms
- The
art of effective scheduling has largely disappeared from the project
landscape.
- Uncertainty
and complexity are starting to take centre stage.
- Activities
are not planned with attributes of ownership
- Traceability
of accountability of activities missing
- RBS
not matching with WBS
- Sequencing
of Activities not planned by site in charge or last planner but depended
on a fixed CPM given by HO
- Calculation
of duration of activities not accurate
- Problems
in CPM , the Critical path by software is 100 % incorrect as we
don’t support with correct inputs and feedback to planner, and we don’t
know how to manage it to correct
- Not
Accurate
- Does
not cater for things going wrong on site
- Does
not cater for Human element not performing
- If a
single task on CP is late, entire C P is late
¡
Costing
¡
We don’t do proper
costing of all Activities
¡
We don't track COPQ
and do not control account , we don’t do EVM/forecasting etc
¡
Quality/HR/
Communication Misc coordination A few problems :
¡
Quality metrics not
worked out in advance
¡
Team not sure what
to check& How to check
¡
Untrained team in
Quality parameters
¡
Documentation poor
¡
Communication
clarity missing
Execution
§ We don’t do proper briefing of team before operation
starts
§ There is no clear cut role and responsibilities
§ We don’t do reassessment of situation on ground, the real
exact situation for any changes
§ We think our tactical plan is best and to be followed .
§ We don’t ensure team is aware of SOP/drills to be
followed.
§ Change and Risk Management We think our plan is the Perfect
without any loopholes till we get punched in the face
§ We don’t think of anything going wrong
§ Let it come, we will handle that time is the attitude
¡
Big Gap what we plan
and how we execute
¡ Results in avoidable delays + miss outs+
rework+ over run in cost
All companies make junior /contractor/ customer as over all responsible for our failure and somehow close the project (if we are successful), forget our experience and move on to next project with similar mistakes .
¡ Demanding
Customer for whom work keeps changing/ his non commitments
¡ Other
stakeholders non cooperation
¡ Non
Cooperative Supplier/Contractor
¡ Untrained
Team
Political/Economical
/ Social /Climatic condition not catered for
All companies must take charge and be
responsible for planning with own team + customer and drive contractors to
deliver , with a detailed planning that continues before the execution
and even through -out the execution and even later till
we close out and get out. Aim is to convert our execution to
best possible results against all problems in the world.